A dose of WTF from FSTDT.com
Mar. 31st, 2008 08:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
desertvixenActually, it's a Daily Double WTF!
http://www.fstdt.com/fundies/comments.aspx?q=36935
A daughter who marries and makes her babies when she's biologically ready, at around age 14 to 16, will be a grandmother in her 30s when feminazi are still rushing to fertility clinics. She will then have several decades to get a PhD education and career without the social pressure and emotional drives to make babies. She can have it all, but only if she is encouraged to follow her biological needs and do things in the order that biology allows. Tell the feminazi to pound sand. And help young females like Jamie Spears and a million others to have a good, rich, fulfilled life with a husband and family.
You know, idiots who confuse "menstruates" with "biologically ready to give birth" really piss me off. Please, make the stupid people go away.
Also, there's that whole resources thing. Jamie-Lynn Spears? Has them. Average teenager? Does not.
http://www.fstdt.com/fundies/comments.aspx?q=36929
As a result, women are filing for divorcing in America at least TWICE the rate of men, buying into the lying feminist propaganda that husbands who give orders are guilty of "domestic abuse." Search online under "domestic abuse" and you'll find that a husband who tracks his wife's time and whereabouts is considered "abusive." That's a lie of the Devil. A husband has every God-given right to exercise authority over his wife, and to DEMAND that she do as he says. I dare say 1-out-of-1,000 wives today are truly submissive in the Biblical sense. Is it any wonder that American women have murdered nearly 50,000,000 of their babies by abortion? Not at all, most of America's women have become selfish and godless. Women have become intolerant of the husband's authority in a marriage, and of God's authority concerning life itself, i.e., thou shall not kill.
No, I sure am not submissive in the Biblical sense. That's because marriage is a PARTNERSHIP. There is EQUALITY involved. Just because a wife is not a doormat does not mean she's wearing the pants. I know, the shock. Men and women working together.
*** *** ***
Just remember: it is good the crazies have access to the Internet, that way we know they are out there.
DV
http://www.fstdt.com/fundies/comments.aspx?q=36935
A daughter who marries and makes her babies when she's biologically ready, at around age 14 to 16, will be a grandmother in her 30s when feminazi are still rushing to fertility clinics. She will then have several decades to get a PhD education and career without the social pressure and emotional drives to make babies. She can have it all, but only if she is encouraged to follow her biological needs and do things in the order that biology allows. Tell the feminazi to pound sand. And help young females like Jamie Spears and a million others to have a good, rich, fulfilled life with a husband and family.
You know, idiots who confuse "menstruates" with "biologically ready to give birth" really piss me off. Please, make the stupid people go away.
Also, there's that whole resources thing. Jamie-Lynn Spears? Has them. Average teenager? Does not.
http://www.fstdt.com/fundies/comments.aspx?q=36929
As a result, women are filing for divorcing in America at least TWICE the rate of men, buying into the lying feminist propaganda that husbands who give orders are guilty of "domestic abuse." Search online under "domestic abuse" and you'll find that a husband who tracks his wife's time and whereabouts is considered "abusive." That's a lie of the Devil. A husband has every God-given right to exercise authority over his wife, and to DEMAND that she do as he says. I dare say 1-out-of-1,000 wives today are truly submissive in the Biblical sense. Is it any wonder that American women have murdered nearly 50,000,000 of their babies by abortion? Not at all, most of America's women have become selfish and godless. Women have become intolerant of the husband's authority in a marriage, and of God's authority concerning life itself, i.e., thou shall not kill.
No, I sure am not submissive in the Biblical sense. That's because marriage is a PARTNERSHIP. There is EQUALITY involved. Just because a wife is not a doormat does not mean she's wearing the pants. I know, the shock. Men and women working together.
*** *** ***
Just remember: it is good the crazies have access to the Internet, that way we know they are out there.
DV
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 01:20 am (UTC)I think I would do much better at the range if they were the little targets that popped up. Because I seriously should not be sharing air with such fucking wastes of space/air.
Tracking your wife's movements = crazy, psycho, stalker behavior that requires a restraining order at the very least (and I am being kind).
*goes and fumes*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 02:41 am (UTC)This is me, loudly not arguing.
Thanks for bringing me the stuff again, btw.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 10:45 pm (UTC)No problem, I'm sorry I had it for so long. I can't wait to see Adrianna in her little shirt! (I didn't wash it because I am not sure what kind of detergent you prefer and all that.)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 02:41 am (UTC)I love FSTDT, it's my daily dose of crazy.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 03:12 am (UTC)Yep. Keep 'em uneducated, so they don't know they actually have options and *choices* in life. then again I'm part of the leftist, godless ivory tower.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:18 am (UTC)And you have had cats and rats, which we all know are furry little agents of Satan!
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:21 am (UTC)You will note that I posted it after dinner was cooked.
Besides, if there's no man around for me to be submissive to, does my existence matter?
/jk
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:00 am (UTC)On the other hand, the first poster is correct, even if her timeline is, ah, a little off.
The best move for a woman who wants to maximize her professional success (whether in terms of money, power, or prestige--or some combination of the three) is to either
(1) Refrain from having children (no-brainer) or
(2) Marry and have her children in her late teens-to-early 20s. She can begin stepping up her career as the children hit school age and give it her full time and attention in her mid-30s when the children hit college age. Her husband (who presumably took the (1) track, should be at a point where his own career is beginning to wind down and can support his wife's goals as necessary.
All it requires is a realistic attitude toward human biology and a flexible attitude toward gender roles. And if you think the right and the left will ever make a marriage of two minds in this, I have some swampland you might be interested in buying...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:28 am (UTC)Yes, I fully admit these people are not mainstream. Thankfully. It's my daily dose of crazy.
The problem with scenario #2 is college + kids can easily not equal "success". Some of it depends on the individual people and situation, but if they're both in college and she's having the kids... how much help is he going to be?
I won't deny that having children is a reason I started looking away from law and into teaching - I don't think the legal environment meshes well with my intentions on raising our family, especially when I figure in the deployed husband bit.
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly that flexibility when it comes to gender roles is a GOOD thing.
I'll have to pass on the swampland, though.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 03:27 am (UTC)A longer reply to my agreeing to pass on the swampland?
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 02:23 pm (UTC)it also says that men are fools if they don't listen to their wives and consider their advice.
I hate people who only use parts of the Bible to further their "ideas" and turn a blind eye towards the rest of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:31 am (UTC)Check.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-01 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:36 am (UTC)I sort of like how he implies that "feminazi" is one of those collective nouns.
Or he's too stupid to pluralize words.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 03:03 am (UTC)Yes. I will email you.
DV
no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-02 12:38 am (UTC)