(no subject)
Jun. 28th, 2006 09:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
desertvixenhttp://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060628/en_celeb_eo/19388
Britney Bares All
By Sarah Hall 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
Apparently,Britney Spears is out to prove she's not a girl and very much a woman.
Just days after baring her soul on Dateline, the pregnant pop tart is taking a page out of
Demi Moore's playbook and baring, well, everything else, for the cover of the August issue of Harper's Bazaar.
The magazine confirmed Wednesday that Spears posed in the nude for the cover and an accompanying feature story and photo spread at a shoot on Thursday.
Unfortunately for Harper's, said photos leaked onto the Internet shortly after the conclusion of the shoot and were available on various Websites as of Wednesday afternoon.
In the images, a newly dark-haired Spears strikes various poses in all her six-months-pregnant glory, sometimes clothed, sometimes not.
A naked Sean Preston makes a cameo in one of the photos, clutched in his mother's arms. A naked Kevin Federline, thankfully, did not make the cut.
After the leak, Harper's released the cover shot for publicity purposes, but informed the non-Internet-using segment of its readership that it would have to wait until the issue hit stands on July 25 to view the rest of the spread.
Spears', shall we say, artsy cover girl stint comes after the singer was reportedly shocked by the negative reaction to her recent tearful Dateline confessional.
In a poll conducted by Us Weekly, 87 percent of respondents said they had less respect for Spears after her sitdown with Matt Lauer. Meanwhile, the New York Post reported that the NBC crew filming the interview was so startled by Spears' disheveled appearance when they arrived that they thought they had the wrong day.
As a result of the backlash, Spears apparently decided to prove that with the help of a little airbrushing, she can be the same Britney we once knew and loved. Except, you know, pregnant.
Meanwhile, according to a report in In Touch Weekly, Spears is considering returning to her roots--and not just the brunette ones. The magazine claims that the Louisiana native is considering moving back home to the town of Kentwood, where she was born.
"She wants to come home," Kentwood Mayor Harold Smith told the magazine. "She's building more rooms for her growing family. She wants a nursery and some kids' rooms."
The magazine claims that Federline is supportive of his wife's wishes, though there's no telling how the move could affect his quest to save the penny.
The couple is expecting their second child together, and Federline's fourth overall, in October.
DV
Britney Bares All
By Sarah Hall 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
Apparently,Britney Spears is out to prove she's not a girl and very much a woman.
Just days after baring her soul on Dateline, the pregnant pop tart is taking a page out of
Demi Moore's playbook and baring, well, everything else, for the cover of the August issue of Harper's Bazaar.
The magazine confirmed Wednesday that Spears posed in the nude for the cover and an accompanying feature story and photo spread at a shoot on Thursday.
Unfortunately for Harper's, said photos leaked onto the Internet shortly after the conclusion of the shoot and were available on various Websites as of Wednesday afternoon.
In the images, a newly dark-haired Spears strikes various poses in all her six-months-pregnant glory, sometimes clothed, sometimes not.
A naked Sean Preston makes a cameo in one of the photos, clutched in his mother's arms. A naked Kevin Federline, thankfully, did not make the cut.
After the leak, Harper's released the cover shot for publicity purposes, but informed the non-Internet-using segment of its readership that it would have to wait until the issue hit stands on July 25 to view the rest of the spread.
Spears', shall we say, artsy cover girl stint comes after the singer was reportedly shocked by the negative reaction to her recent tearful Dateline confessional.
In a poll conducted by Us Weekly, 87 percent of respondents said they had less respect for Spears after her sitdown with Matt Lauer. Meanwhile, the New York Post reported that the NBC crew filming the interview was so startled by Spears' disheveled appearance when they arrived that they thought they had the wrong day.
As a result of the backlash, Spears apparently decided to prove that with the help of a little airbrushing, she can be the same Britney we once knew and loved. Except, you know, pregnant.
Meanwhile, according to a report in In Touch Weekly, Spears is considering returning to her roots--and not just the brunette ones. The magazine claims that the Louisiana native is considering moving back home to the town of Kentwood, where she was born.
"She wants to come home," Kentwood Mayor Harold Smith told the magazine. "She's building more rooms for her growing family. She wants a nursery and some kids' rooms."
The magazine claims that Federline is supportive of his wife's wishes, though there's no telling how the move could affect his quest to save the penny.
The couple is expecting their second child together, and Federline's fourth overall, in October.
DV
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 01:58 am (UTC)What entertains me is that during the excerpt of the Dateline interview they were playing on CNN, where she talks about how they're human and they need their privacy? If you need your privacy, why are you putting pics of your six month pregnant self on the cover of a magazine?
I had Glamour Shots done at the end of May, so month 6 or 7 of this process which, hopefully, soon after July 29th or so will be OVER. However, I'd never want them just "out and about".
DV
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 02:00 am (UTC)Like I said, she's just tacky.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 02:19 am (UTC)Like I said, I'd never want them out and about. They're for me, and my family, not magazine covers. They turned out quite nice, actually.
DV
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 03:32 am (UTC)Until I met John, I wasn't going to be pregnant. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 04:54 pm (UTC)