desertvixen: (brightness)
[personal profile] desertvixen
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/15/AR2006051500875.html?referrer=emailarticle

Forever Pregnant
Guidelines: Treat Nearly All Women as Pre-Pregnant

By January W. Payne
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 16, 2006; Page HE01

New federal guidelines ask all females capable of conceiving a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-pregnant, regardless of whether they plan to get pregnant anytime soon.

Among other things, this means all women between first menstrual period and menopause should take folic acid supplements, refrain from smoking, maintain a healthy weight and keep chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes under control.

Guidelines Urge Women to Be Prepared for Pregnancy
A new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report seeks to improve preconception health and health care. The advice is aimed at patients, doctors, public health professionals, researchers, policymakers and government agencies. The steps recommended for patients include:

While most of these recommendations are well known to women who are pregnant or seeking to get pregnant, experts say it's important that women follow this advice throughout their reproductive lives, because about half of pregnancies are unplanned and so much damage can be done to a fetus between conception and the time the pregnancy is confirmed.

The recommendations aim to "increase public awareness of the importance of preconception health" and emphasize the "importance of managing risk factors prior to pregnancy," said Samuel Posner, co-author of the guidelines and associate director for science in the division of reproductive health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which issued the report.

Other groups involved include the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the March of Dimes, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention's Division of Reproductive Health and the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.

The idea of preconception care has been discussed for nearly 20 years, experts said, but it has drawn more attention recently. Progress toward further reducing the rate of unhealthy pregnancy results, including premature birth, low birthweight and infant mortality, has slowed in the United States since 1996 "in part because of inconsistent delivery and implementation of interventions before pregnancy to detect, treat and help women modify behaviors, health conditions and risk factors that contribute to adverse maternal and infant outcomes," according to the report.

Nearly 28,000 U.S. infants died in 2003, according to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The infant mortality rate increased in 2002 for the first time in more than 40 years to seven deaths per 1,000 live births, but it did not change significantly in 2003. Birth defects, low birthweight and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were the leading causes of infant death in 2003, according to NCHS.

The U.S. infant mortality rate is higher than those of most other industrialized nations -- it's three times that of Japan and 2.5 times those of Norway, Finland and Iceland, according to a report released last week by Save the Children, an advocacy group.

Preconception care should be delivered by any doctor a patient sees -- from her primary care physician to her gynecologist. It involves developing a "reproductive health plan" that details if and when children are planned, said Janis Biermann, a report co-author and vice president for education and health promotion at the March of Dimes.

"The recommendations say we need to be opportunistic," or deliver care and counseling when opportunities arise, said Merry-K. Moos, a professor in the University of North Carolina's maternal fetal medicine division who sat on the CDC advisory panel. "Healthier women have healthier pregnancies."

Women should also make sure all vaccinations are up-to-date and avoid contact with lead-based paints and cat feces, Biermann said.

The report recommends that women stop smoking and discuss with their doctor the danger alcohol poses to a developing fetus.

Research shows that "during the first few weeks (before 52 days' gestation) of pregnancy" -- during which a woman may not yet realize she's pregnant -- "exposure to alcohol, tobacco and other drugs; lack of essential vitamins (e.g., folic acid); and workplace hazards can adversely affect fetal development and result in pregnancy complications and poor outcomes for both the mother and the infant," the report states.

The CDC report also discusses disparities in care, noting that approximately 17 million women lack health insurance and are likely to postpone or forgo care. These disparities are more prominent among minority groups and those of lower socioeconomic status, the report states.

The NCHS data also reflect these disparities. Babies born to black mothers, for example, had the highest rate of infant death -- 13.5 per 1,000 live births. Infants born to white women had a death rate of 5.7 per 1,000.

Obstacles to preconception care include getting insurance companies to pay for visits and putting the concept into regular use by doctors and patients. Experts acknowledge that women with no plans to get pregnant in the near future may resist preconception care.

"We know that women -- unless you're actively planning [a pregnancy], . . . she doesn't want to talk about it," Biermann said. So clinicians must find a "way to do this and not scare women," by promoting preconception care as part of standard women's health care, she said.

Some medical facilities have already found a way to weave preconception care in with regular visits. At Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, N.Y., a form that's filled out when checking a patient's height, weight and blood pressure prompts nurses to ask women, "Do you smoke, and do you plan to become pregnant in the next year? And if not, what birth control are you using?"

"It's a simple way of getting primary care providers to think about preconception care," said Peter Bernstein, a maternal fetal medicine specialist who sat on the advisory committee that helped produce the report. "It's simple and [it] costs nothing." ยท

New federal guidelines ask all females capable of conceiving a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-pregnant, regardless of whether they plan to get pregnant anytime soon.

experts say it's important that women follow this advice throughout their reproductive lives, because about half of pregnancies are unplanned and so much damage can be done to a fetus between conception and the time the pregnancy is confirmed

So, are these people just assuming that birth control and abortion are off the menu? Yes, I know accidents can happen when birth control is being used.

But I have a few problems with this:

1) Why should ALL women have to have this forced or guilted upon them just because we might be using our uterus at some point? Some suggestions, like smoking and drinking, are obviously good for your health, but don't try to guilt people into this stuff.

2) The cat feces thing. So, are they in effect saying that single women shouldn't have cats? That teenage girls should not have to clean the kitty litter box? Is some enterprising male going to start a cleaning service specializing in doing litterboxes so women don't have to mess with them? (If someone in the Augusta area is doing #3, let me know....)

3) When are men going to be guilt-tripped...I mean, advised to guard their health so they can be good parents? I know the biological issues aren't as full of impact as they can be for women, but let's have a little equality here.

4) So, how come the same government that is pushing this isn't pushing more affordable, low-cost health care for women, rather than trying to get the fetus covered separately?

Off to go wonder what sort of world we're introducing the MicroVixen to....

DV

Date: 2006-05-16 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kishiriadgr.livejournal.com
I don't even *have* a health care provider. As a reservist with no full time job, I have no health insurance, ergo, no doctor. Ask me if I'm pleased.

While part of me is internally screaming "Handmaid's Tale!" the other part of me is cynically thinking that this is just the federal government putting on a happy face and saying, "Oh, we'll take care of our problems with high infant mortality and poor neonatal health by just treating all women this way when they go to the doctor."

Never mind for a second that the ones who have the infant mortality and sick babies are the ones who won't ever be affected by this asinine plan.

When I finally do get a doctor, she (and she will be a she) and I will have a no-nonsense discussion about this in our first meeting. [profile] americanstd got a vasectomy before we ever even met, so birth control's not an issue.

Date: 2006-05-16 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mamid.livejournal.com
I was talking about my pregnancy to a woman on the weekend. She told me flat out that not having prenatal care was tantamount to child abuse.

I was wt,f! Here I am, unable to find a gp and I'm therefore committing child abuse? wonder what she'd think about my wanting a UC.

This pre-pregnancy care is stupid. It'll mean that women'll have to have at least 6 visits a year or more in order to be considered "appropriate" gestational providers. UGH.

Date: 2006-05-17 05:36 am (UTC)
ext_5457: (Default)
From: [identity profile] xinef.livejournal.com
According to what I just read in someone else's LJ, the actual CDC memo is far less obnoxious than the Washington Post article on it. You might find this post (http://kd5mdk.livejournal.com/130320.html) interesting.

Date: 2006-05-17 07:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daveamongus.livejournal.com
Ditto [livejournal.com profile] xinef.

Evidently, a core part of the recommendations (and they are just recommendations) was for the doctors to discuss with their patients their reproductive plans and encourage them accordingly. Planning to have kids at some point? Here's Course A. Not planning on it? Then let's get you going on B, C, or D.

Date: 2006-05-17 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rockahulababy.livejournal.com
The problem with that is, if the person/couple don't plan on having children they are second guessed and told that they'll "change their minds". Not in all cases, but I've talked to a lot of women who have a lot of issues getting any form of permanent sterilization. I, being a single and childless woman, went to a doctor and inquired about getting an IUD and was told by the doctor that he wouldn't give me an IUD because there is a 1% chance that I could become infertile and "he wouldn't be comfortable with the possibility that I become infertile and then down the road want to have children, but can't".

Date: 2006-05-17 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daveamongus.livejournal.com
As I understood it, that's the way things have more or less always been. Does this latest set of guidelines represent a change? If, as was my impression, they are outlining recommendations for people who do not plan on having children at any point, then this would be something different. Otherwise, it would be just an affirmation of the status quo. Not awesome, but nothing crazy-bad either.

Date: 2006-05-17 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilytree.livejournal.com
I think in theory, especially for health care providers, it's a good idea. We already do it for a lot of things anyway. If you come into the children's ER for ANYTHING and you are of an age where you could be menstruating, you get a pg test. They don't want to risk accidentally doing something that could harm a fetus.

The cat poop thing. Really, most cat owners have had/been exposed to toxoplamosis prior to getting pregnant, and so it's not an issue. They tell pg women not to do it, because if they haven't had it before and manage to get their first case while pg, it could really hurt the baby.

And to the poster above, it so is not child abuse. If you are taking vitamins, not drinking, not smoking, there's nothing a OB/GYN can really do for you in those first months unless you have incompetent cervix or are a type I diabetic. Most of that stuff is just watching and monitoring. So don't freak out if you haven't gotten in yet.

Date: 2006-05-17 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desert-vixen.livejournal.com

The cat poop thing. Really, most cat owners have had/been exposed to toxoplamosis prior to getting pregnant, and so it's not an issue. They tell pg women not to do it, because if they haven't had it before and manage to get their first case while pg, it could really hurt the baby.

Yes, I read about the possible effects, and I see why the concern. But it's also something that you can get from digging around in soil (partly because of cat feces in soil) or from raw, infected meat. I'm pretty sure I've been exposed pre-pregnancy, having been around the furballs for most of my life.

A lot of military medicine folks (in my experience, at least) are willing to take your word for lack of possibility. Gordon is the first place where I've had to pee in a cup before they would stick me.

DV

Date: 2006-05-17 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desert-vixen.livejournal.com

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] xinef and [livejournal.com profile] daveamongus for the link to the post. He's on my f-list, so I would have gotten to the post on my own, but not for awhile, given today.

Teaches me to get worked up over an article. :)

DV

Date: 2006-05-18 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angeldecoy.livejournal.com
You know, all of this falls under the reasons i'm fed up with 'health care'. renaming it health-business would be more suiting.

Profile

desertvixen: (Default)
desertvixen

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   123 4
5678 9 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 12th, 2026 09:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios