desertvixen (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
desertvixen) wrote2006-08-30 09:53 pm
desertvixen) wrote2006-08-30 09:53 pm
(no subject)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14589472/
Education sec’y: No Child act needs no changes
As contentious law faces renewal, Spellings calls it ‘99.9 percent pure’
WASHINGTON - Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said Wednesday the No Child Left Behind Act is close to perfect and needs little change as its first major update draws near.
“I talk about No Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It’s 99.9 percent pure or something,” Spellings told reporters. “There’s not much needed in the way of change.”
Spellings’ comments signal what amounts to the Bush administration’s starting position as the law comes up for renewal. That is scheduled to happen as soon as next year.
It is unsurprising that Spellings strongly supports the law. She helped craft it as President Bush’s domestic policy chief and now enforces it as the top education official.
Yet her view that the law needs little change is notable because it differs so sharply from others with a stake, including many teachers, school administrators and lawmakers.
Already, the House education committee is holding hearings on how to improve the law. So is a prominent bipartisan commission, which is touring the nation to gather opinions.
Educators urge basic changes
More than 80 organizations have signed a statement urging fundamental changes, in areas such as how student progress is measured and how schools are penalized when they fall short. And the National Conference of State Legislatures has given the law a scathing rebuke.
“You cannot ignore reality,” said Reg Weaver, president of the National Education Association, the largest teachers union in the country.
“The reality is that poll after poll speaks to the concerns that people have,” Weaver said. “They are not arguing with the goals. They are not arguing with accountability. But they say something needs to be done to fix this law.”
Signed by Bush in 2002, the law is widely considered the most significant federal education act since Congress approved its original version in 1965.
It aims to ensure that all children can read and do math at grade level by 2014, an aspiration that has placed unprecedented demands on schools. The law requires states to increase testing, raise teacher quality and give more attention to minority children.
Poor schools that get federal aid but don’t make enough progress face consequences.
Flexibility wins her praise
Spellings has made her mark as secretary by enforcing the law with flexibility.
In areas such as tutoring and testing, she has approved experiments to see what may work better — an approach that has won her praise.
“I think it would be foolhardy for me to sit up here and just say ‘we’re not going to react to anything that we’re learning over time,’ ” she said in an interview with reporters at the Education Department.
Spellings said her job is to present Congress with good data to help lawmakers do their job. She said she is open-minded about ways to improve the law.
But when asked if she meant the law is truly “99.9 percent” close to working properly, she said, “I think it is that close.”
She pointed as much to attitudes as test scores.
Now, she said, states and schools are debating how better to help children with limited English skills and students with disabilities.
“Just the level of sophistication of the conversation around these issues is, to me, the big news out of No Child Left Behind,” she said.
I'm not in the profession, but it is something we're tossing around. And I have to say, "Excuse me?" to this one. How about funding the thing like it's supposed to and not the reduced version they approved?
We're SERIOUSLY considering Catholic school or another private school for the Little Vixen, so much so that we're thinking of establishing a Coverdell ESA for her.
Things like this are part of the reason why....
DV
Education sec’y: No Child act needs no changes
As contentious law faces renewal, Spellings calls it ‘99.9 percent pure’
WASHINGTON - Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said Wednesday the No Child Left Behind Act is close to perfect and needs little change as its first major update draws near.
“I talk about No Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It’s 99.9 percent pure or something,” Spellings told reporters. “There’s not much needed in the way of change.”
Spellings’ comments signal what amounts to the Bush administration’s starting position as the law comes up for renewal. That is scheduled to happen as soon as next year.
It is unsurprising that Spellings strongly supports the law. She helped craft it as President Bush’s domestic policy chief and now enforces it as the top education official.
Yet her view that the law needs little change is notable because it differs so sharply from others with a stake, including many teachers, school administrators and lawmakers.
Already, the House education committee is holding hearings on how to improve the law. So is a prominent bipartisan commission, which is touring the nation to gather opinions.
Educators urge basic changes
More than 80 organizations have signed a statement urging fundamental changes, in areas such as how student progress is measured and how schools are penalized when they fall short. And the National Conference of State Legislatures has given the law a scathing rebuke.
“You cannot ignore reality,” said Reg Weaver, president of the National Education Association, the largest teachers union in the country.
“The reality is that poll after poll speaks to the concerns that people have,” Weaver said. “They are not arguing with the goals. They are not arguing with accountability. But they say something needs to be done to fix this law.”
Signed by Bush in 2002, the law is widely considered the most significant federal education act since Congress approved its original version in 1965.
It aims to ensure that all children can read and do math at grade level by 2014, an aspiration that has placed unprecedented demands on schools. The law requires states to increase testing, raise teacher quality and give more attention to minority children.
Poor schools that get federal aid but don’t make enough progress face consequences.
Flexibility wins her praise
Spellings has made her mark as secretary by enforcing the law with flexibility.
In areas such as tutoring and testing, she has approved experiments to see what may work better — an approach that has won her praise.
“I think it would be foolhardy for me to sit up here and just say ‘we’re not going to react to anything that we’re learning over time,’ ” she said in an interview with reporters at the Education Department.
Spellings said her job is to present Congress with good data to help lawmakers do their job. She said she is open-minded about ways to improve the law.
But when asked if she meant the law is truly “99.9 percent” close to working properly, she said, “I think it is that close.”
She pointed as much to attitudes as test scores.
Now, she said, states and schools are debating how better to help children with limited English skills and students with disabilities.
“Just the level of sophistication of the conversation around these issues is, to me, the big news out of No Child Left Behind,” she said.
I'm not in the profession, but it is something we're tossing around. And I have to say, "Excuse me?" to this one. How about funding the thing like it's supposed to and not the reduced version they approved?
We're SERIOUSLY considering Catholic school or another private school for the Little Vixen, so much so that we're thinking of establishing a Coverdell ESA for her.
Things like this are part of the reason why....
DV
no subject
If we had the money, we'd put our kids in private schools too.
no subject
no subject
Also, it penalizes schools and teacher who *do* work with underprivileged students, or non-native speakers of English. And if merit raises are tied to students' test/class scores, pardon my cynicism in thinking "grade inflation."
Not every child is going to get an "A." Or even a "C." I laud efforts to improve our school systems, but not ones that presuppose that all children are equal, academically speaking. This isn't meant to sound elitist; children with learning disabilities should have the time and care they need to understand the topics without penalizing the kid who walked in practically knowing the subject. And the teacher who has to choose between one group or the other shouldn't be penalized for working with kids who *need* that help and whose scores may not be as high as the ones sitting at the Red Robins table. (And having had bright kids WITH learning disabilities, it is particularly important to me).
no subject
Interestingly, the one schoolteacher on my f-list was just crowing over not being under NCLB until 2008, when hopefully it will have been done away with.