desertvixen: (feminine intuition)
desertvixen ([personal profile] desertvixen) wrote2008-03-31 08:07 pm

[livejournal.com profile] tepintzin brought it to my attention

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23884819/

In a historic but little-noticed change in policy, the Army is allowing scores of husband-and-wife soldiers to live and sleep together in the war zone — a move aimed at preserving marriages, boosting morale and perhaps bolstering re-enlistment rates at a time when the military is struggling to fill its ranks five years into the fighting.

*** *** ***

Opinions?

Personally, for myself, I'd rather we deployed separately so that someone is here, providing stability for MV. Also, I think I would spend a lot of time worrying about whether or not we were presenting an image that would make people jealous. I also think the no-PDA rule would be very hard.

DV

[identity profile] kishiriadgr.livejournal.com 2008-04-01 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
The more I think about it, the more I think it's a bad idea. I think it's cruel towards the people whose spouses and partners aren't Army and thus not in Iraq. I can see it as more of a morale buster than booster.

Am cross-posting this comment to my own journal.

[identity profile] domesticjulie.livejournal.com 2008-04-01 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
I think it is a lose-lose for everybody.

[identity profile] gi-janearng.livejournal.com 2008-04-01 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
It would be nice in a perfect world, but I think in reality, it would mean living under a microscope.

On the other hand, I saw lots of married couples deploy together in the same unit but couldn't live together due to then policy. I'm sure that would be like having a carrot dangled in front of you all the time. You can see it, but you can't have it.

Sounds like it could be a crappy situation either way.